A formal theory of generalized intermediate syllogisms

نویسندگان

  • Petra Murinová
  • Vilém Novák
چکیده

This paper is a continuation of the formal theory of intermediate quantifiers (expressions such as most, few, almost all, a lot of, many, a great deal of, a large part of, a small part of ) introduced by Novák in [12]. The theory is a fuzzy-logic formalization of the concept introduced by Peterson in his book [17]. In this paper, we syntactically prove that 105 generalized Aristotle’s syllogism introduced in Peterson’s book are in our theory valid. At the same time, we also proved that various syllogisms listed there as invalid are invalid also in our theory. Therefore, we believe that our theory provides a reasonable mathematical model of the generalized syllogistics.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The analysis of the generalized square of opposition

In this paper, we continue the development of a formal theory of intermediate quantifiers (linguistic expressions such as “most”, “many”, “few”, “almost all”, etc.). In previous work, we demonstrated that 105 generalized syllogisms are valid in our theory. We turn our attention to another problem which is the analysis of the generalized Aristotelian square of opposition which, besides the class...

متن کامل

Intermediate Syllogisms in Fuzzy Natural Logic

The goal of this paper is twofold: first, we give overview of the results of one part of the Fuzzy Natural Logic — the formal theory of intermediate quantifiers and syllogisms based on them. We present 105 valid basic syllogisms and show that for the proof of validity of all of them, we need to prove validity of only few of them so that validity of the other ones immediately follows. In the sec...

متن کامل

Some arguments are probably valid: Syllogistic reasoning as communication

Syllogistic reasoning lies at the intriguing intersection of natural and formal reasoning, of language and logic. Syllogisms comprise a formal system of reasoning yet use natural language quantifiers, and invite natural language conclusions. How can we make sense of the interplay between logic and language? We develop a computational-level theory that considers reasoning over concrete situation...

متن کامل

An algebraic study of Peterson's Intermediate Syllogisms

Peterson’s Intermediate Syllogisms, generalizing Aristotelian syllogisms by intermediate quantifiers ‘Many’, ‘Most’ and ‘Almost all’, are studied. It is demonstrated that, by associating certain values V, W and U on standard Lukasiewicz MV–algebra with the first and second premise and the conclusion, respectively, the validity of a corresponding intermediate syllogism is determined by a simple ...

متن کامل

Suhrawardi's Modal Syllogisms

Suhrawardi’s logic of the Hikmat al-Ishraq is basically modal. So to understand his modal logic one first has to know the non-modal part upon which his modal logic is built. In my previous paper ‘Suhrawardi on Syllogisms’(3) I discussed the former in detail. The present paper is an exposition of his treatment of modal syllogisms. On the basis of some reasonable existential presuppositi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Fuzzy Sets and Systems

دوره 186  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012